2.5

CiteScore

8.8

Global Impact Factor

Study of Sustainability in Indian Design Education: A Pedagogical Approach in Ahmedabad


Paper ID: EIJTEM_2026_13_2_100-103

Author's Name: Krishna Nagori, Dr Payal Mehta

Volume: 13

Issue: 2

Year: 2026

Page No: 100-103

Abstract:

Sustainability has become a fundamental concern in design education because the decisions made by future designers directly influence environmental performance, resource use, and the quality of the built environment. In the Indian context, and particularly in Ahmedabad, there is a growing need to examine how sustainability is being addressed within design curricula and teaching practices. This study investigates the presence of sustainability in Indian design education, evaluates faculty readiness and student awareness, and identifies the pedagogical and institutional barriers that limit effective integration. The research adopts a survey-based approach supported by interviews with educators to understand current classroom practices and curriculum structure. Findings suggest that sustainability is often introduced in an informal or fragmented manner rather than as a structured part of design education. Although many educators express interest in sustainability, several report limited training, inadequate learning resources, and overloaded curricula as major challenges. The study proposes that sustainability should be introduced early and reinforced across studio, theory, and technical courses through a holistic teaching model. It also recommends the use of contemporary pedagogical tools, local case studies, and digital technologies to strengthen sustainability learning in design programs.

Keywords: Sustainability, design education, pedagogy, curriculum integration, Ahmedabad, India

References:

Battisto, J. (2001). New learning module on the relationship between architecture, human health and sustainable environments. University of South Carolina.
Bonda, P. (2003). Why green design matters. ASID ICON, 11–13.
Brundtland, G. H. (Ed.). (1987). Our common future: The World Commission on Environment and Development. Oxford University Press.
Chermayeff, S. (1982). Design and the public good. MIT Press.
Council for Interior Design Accreditation. (2006). Accreditation standards and guidelines. CIDA.
El-Zeiny, R. M. A. (2012). Sustainability in the education of interior designers in Egypt. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 38, 122–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.332
Findeli, A. (2001). Rethinking design education for the 21st century: Theoretical, methodological, and ethical discussion. Design Issues, 19(1), 5–17.
Flynn, K. (2007). What do clients expect? Implications, 29(9), 4–5. Fry, T. (1993). Re-thinking ecodesign. Object, 43.
Gould, K. L. (2002, November). Teaching green: Design with values. Metropolis.
Hutchison, D. (1998). Growing up green: Education for ecological renewal. Teachers College Press.
Krasner, L. (Ed.). (1980). Environmental design and human behavior. Pergamon Press.
Lapiana, M. (2006). Talking about green design so clients will listen. ASID ICON, 50–53.
Stegall, N. (2006). Designing for sustainability: A philosophy for ecologically intentional design. Design Issues, 22(2), 56–63.
Stieg, C. (2006). The sustainability gap. Journal of Interior Design, 32(1), vii–xxi. White Myer, D. (2007). The road to green. Perspective, 9–19.
Yang, Y., & Giard, J. (2001). Industrial design education or sustainability: Structural elements and pedagogical solutions. In Proceedings of the IDSA National Design Education Conference

View PDF